Free Essays on How To Be Saved

Romans 3:23-24 in the New International Version (NIV) of the Holy Bible tells us that â€Å"For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified freely by His grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus.† We are all sinners, and we all need justification. The Bible tells us this in many places, and most people believe that there is a right and a wrong. Therefore, if there is a right and a wrong, there must be a way to make the wrongs right again. Jesus provided the way to do this by dying on a cross. John 3:16 says, â€Å"For God so loved the world that He gave His only son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but have eternal life.† (NIV) So, one must believe, accept, and next, spend time with God. The most important part of the plan is probably the most simple. It requires only one thing, and that is to ask. â€Å"And everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Joel 2:32). After asking, one should make a public declaration that they want to be saved, and follow the Lord. Baptism is what Jesus did, and he set an example for us to follow. Paul tells us in Acts 22:16, â€Å"And now, what are you waiting for? Get up, be baptized and wash your sins away, calling on his name.† The salvation plan is simple. It is clear, precise, and possible for most any to understand. Believe in God, repent, ask, and declare. There really isn’t anything that is difficult to understand, but yet it is hard for me to comprehend. Not the how, but why Jesus would do this for us. We killed him by nailing his hand to a tree. That has to hurt very badly. I don’t understand why someone would do this for me, and for the people that actually pierced his skin. We humans are terrible, and I would find if incredibly hard to die for anyone on this earth, but yet God died for the most terrible of people. I recently had an experience that helped me understand the whole salvation plan a... Free Essays on How To Be Saved Free Essays on How To Be Saved Romans 3:23-24 in the New International Version (NIV) of the Holy Bible tells us that â€Å"For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified freely by His grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus.† We are all sinners, and we all need justification. The Bible tells us this in many places, and most people believe that there is a right and a wrong. Therefore, if there is a right and a wrong, there must be a way to make the wrongs right again. Jesus provided the way to do this by dying on a cross. John 3:16 says, â€Å"For God so loved the world that He gave His only son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but have eternal life.† (NIV) So, one must believe, accept, and next, spend time with God. The most important part of the plan is probably the most simple. It requires only one thing, and that is to ask. â€Å"And everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Joel 2:32). After asking, one should make a public declaration that they want to be saved, and follow the Lord. Baptism is what Jesus did, and he set an example for us to follow. Paul tells us in Acts 22:16, â€Å"And now, what are you waiting for? Get up, be baptized and wash your sins away, calling on his name.† The salvation plan is simple. It is clear, precise, and possible for most any to understand. Believe in God, repent, ask, and declare. There really isn’t anything that is difficult to understand, but yet it is hard for me to comprehend. Not the how, but why Jesus would do this for us. We killed him by nailing his hand to a tree. That has to hurt very badly. I don’t understand why someone would do this for me, and for the people that actually pierced his skin. We humans are terrible, and I would find if incredibly hard to die for anyone on this earth, but yet God died for the most terrible of people. I recently had an experience that helped me understand the whole salvation plan a...

Free Essays on Language Differences

The essays â€Å"Mother Tongue† by Amy Tan and â€Å"Public and Private Language† by Richard Rodriquez are recollections of both authors personal battles with language. Their stories are very different but each essay attempts to illustrate the personal struggle the two of them went through to discover their voice. The two of them battled with all the forms of language they had to learn. In their lives they were faced with having two forms of language, the â€Å"private† language that was only spoken at home and the â€Å"public† language that was for everyone else. For Richard Rodriquez his struggle was with English and Spanish alone. Amy Tan, on the other, was faced with different levels of English. In both essays there is discussion of public and private language. Each author defines it differently. Amy Tan defines her â€Å"private† language as a language of intimacy. â€Å"The English I spoke to my mother† (21). It seems to be what she uses with those that are within her family spectrum. â€Å"My husband was with us as well, and he didn’t notice any switch in my English. And then I realized why. It’s because over the twenty years we’ve been together I’ve often used that same kind of English with him, and sometimes he even uses it with me. It has become our language of intimacy, a different sort of English that relates to family talk, the language I grew up with†.(4) The way that Tan and her mother speak to each other is in a form of broken English, an English that comes from an immigrants comprehension of the language. This â€Å"private† language is like a secret code between Tan and her mother. It is the tie that kee ps them connected and close. Richard carries a different perspective of his private language. For Richard there is no explanation or clarification needed. Spanish is what his family speaks at home and to each other. His language is what ties him to his roots and his colture. Rodriquez identifies with his Spa... Free Essays on Language Differences Free Essays on Language Differences The essays â€Å"Mother Tongue† by Amy Tan and â€Å"Public and Private Language† by Richard Rodriquez are recollections of both authors personal battles with language. Their stories are very different but each essay attempts to illustrate the personal struggle the two of them went through to discover their voice. The two of them battled with all the forms of language they had to learn. In their lives they were faced with having two forms of language, the â€Å"private† language that was only spoken at home and the â€Å"public† language that was for everyone else. For Richard Rodriquez his struggle was with English and Spanish alone. Amy Tan, on the other, was faced with different levels of English. In both essays there is discussion of public and private language. Each author defines it differently. Amy Tan defines her â€Å"private† language as a language of intimacy. â€Å"The English I spoke to my mother† (21). It seems to be what she uses with those that are within her family spectrum. â€Å"My husband was with us as well, and he didn’t notice any switch in my English. And then I realized why. It’s because over the twenty years we’ve been together I’ve often used that same kind of English with him, and sometimes he even uses it with me. It has become our language of intimacy, a different sort of English that relates to family talk, the language I grew up with†.(4) The way that Tan and her mother speak to each other is in a form of broken English, an English that comes from an immigrants comprehension of the language. This â€Å"private† language is like a secret code between Tan and her mother. It is the tie that kee ps them connected and close. Richard carries a different perspective of his private language. For Richard there is no explanation or clarification needed. Spanish is what his family speaks at home and to each other. His language is what ties him to his roots and his colture. Rodriquez identifies with his Spa...

In-Flight Security For Airline Passengers Essay

In-Flight Security For Airline Passengers - Essay Example are to be dealt more cautiously. And now more security provisions are added for airline passengers while in air. The project examines and studies all the security measures adhered to by various airlines including FAMs, Flight Deck Officer, Discrete Codes, Crew Members and Reinforced Cockpit Doors. Their training methods, duties, laws and changed laws after September 11 incident has been mentioned in it. It is highly useful for the general public to be assured regarding the present security provided by the airlines. Even the ethical situation and dilemma has been talked about giving due consideration to the delicate issues. No doubt all the training, requirements and implementation of changed laws needs huge budget. But the Under Secretary and Federal Government are obliged to hold all the cost responsibility of training, supervision, equipment etc. hence leaving no expense to the pilots. Training becomes very ideal when it comes to the security of the public especially when carrying loaded guns to fire when in need. The project clearly shows the comparison between the changed laws before and after the fatal incident of September 11. Budgets have been reformed and the government takes the responsibility. Although TSA initially opposed the Flight Deck Officer program to arm and train cockpit personnel. The conclusion states that the top priority of any organization should be the security of the passengers in airlines. Audience Scenario My project is directly approached to the general public boarding airlines on daily basis. It is to shed all their doubts regarding their security and safety in planes while in air. It will be surely of great help to them to get acquainted to various security methods deployed by airlines for their betterment. After reading the report they'll be more confident and easy while boarding the flights especially after what happened on September